Files
mem0/mem0-ts/src/oss/tests/memory.entity-boost.test.ts
T

277 lines
8.5 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Entity boost parallelism tests (#5214).
*
* Verifies that entity boost searches run concurrently via Promise.allSettled,
* scoring is preserved, and individual entity failures don't abort others.
*/
/// <reference types="jest" />
import { Memory } from "../src/memory";
import { ENTITY_BOOST_WEIGHT } from "../src/utils/scoring";
import type { VectorStoreResult } from "../src/types";
jest.setTimeout(15000);
jest.mock("../src/embeddings/google", () => ({
GoogleEmbedder: jest.fn(),
}));
jest.mock("../src/llms/google", () => ({
GoogleLLM: jest.fn(),
}));
jest.mock("../src/llms/openai", () => ({
OpenAILLM: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
generateResponse: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(
JSON.stringify({
memory: [{ id: "0", text: "fact", attributed_to: "user" }],
}),
),
})),
}));
const mockEmbedding = new Array(1536).fill(0.1);
jest.mock("../src/embeddings/openai", () => ({
OpenAIEmbedder: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
embed: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockEmbedding),
embedBatch: jest
.fn()
.mockImplementation((texts: string[]) =>
Promise.resolve(texts.map(() => mockEmbedding)),
),
embeddingDims: 1536,
})),
}));
function makeMatch(
id: string,
score: number,
linkedMemoryIds: string[],
): VectorStoreResult {
return { id, score, payload: { linkedMemoryIds } };
}
function createMemory(): Memory {
return new Memory({
version: "v1.1",
embedder: {
provider: "openai",
config: { apiKey: "test-key", model: "text-embedding-3-small" },
},
vectorStore: {
provider: "memory",
config: {
collectionName: `test-entity-${Date.now()}-${Math.random()}`,
dimension: 1536,
dbPath: ":memory:",
},
},
llm: {
provider: "openai",
config: { apiKey: "test-key", model: "gpt-5-mini" },
},
historyDbPath: ":memory:",
});
}
describe("Entity boost parallelism (#5214)", () => {
let memory: Memory;
beforeEach(() => {
memory = createMemory();
});
afterEach(async () => {
await memory.reset();
});
it("should use Promise.allSettled for concurrent entity searches", async () => {
// Spy on Promise.allSettled to confirm it's being used
const allSettledSpy = jest.spyOn(Promise, "allSettled");
// Access internals to inject a mock entity store
const m = memory as any;
await m._ensureInitialized();
const mockEntityStore = {
search: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue([makeMatch("e1", 0.9, ["mem-1"])]),
initialize: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
m._entityStore = mockEntityStore;
m.embedder = {
embed: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockEmbedding),
embedBatch: jest
.fn()
.mockImplementation((texts: string[]) =>
Promise.resolve(texts.map(() => mockEmbedding)),
),
};
// Mock the vector store to return a semantic result
m.vectorStore.search = jest
.fn()
.mockResolvedValue([
{ id: "mem-1", score: 0.8, payload: { data: "test" } },
]);
m.vectorStore.keywordSearch = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(null);
await m.search("alice and bob", { filters: { user_id: "u1" } });
expect(allSettledSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
allSettledSpy.mockRestore();
});
it("should preserve scoring math with parallel execution", async () => {
const m = memory as any;
await m._ensureInitialized();
// Two entities: "alice" links to mem-1, "bob" links to mem-1 and mem-2
// mem-1 should get max(alice_boost, bob_boost)
const mockEntityStore = {
search: jest
.fn()
.mockImplementation(
(_embedding: number[], _topK: number, _filters: any) => {
// We need to differentiate by embedding content — but since all
// embeddings are identical mocks, we'll use call order
const callCount = mockEntityStore.search.mock.calls.length;
if (callCount <= 1) {
// First entity: "alice"
return Promise.resolve([makeMatch("e-alice", 0.9, ["mem-1"])]);
}
// Second entity: "bob"
return Promise.resolve([
makeMatch("e-bob", 0.6, ["mem-1", "mem-2"]),
]);
},
),
initialize: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
m._entityStore = mockEntityStore;
m.embedder = {
embed: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockEmbedding),
embedBatch: jest
.fn()
.mockImplementation((texts: string[]) =>
Promise.resolve(texts.map(() => mockEmbedding)),
),
};
// Semantic results include mem-1 and mem-2
m.vectorStore.search = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue([
{ id: "mem-1", score: 0.85, payload: { data: "alice memory" } },
{ id: "mem-2", score: 0.75, payload: { data: "bob memory" } },
]);
m.vectorStore.keywordSearch = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(null);
const result = await m.search("alice and bob", {
filters: { user_id: "u1" },
});
// Entity store was called (parallelized via Promise.allSettled)
expect(mockEntityStore.search).toHaveBeenCalled();
// Results should exist and have scores
expect(result.results.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
for (const item of result.results) {
expect(typeof item.score).toBe("number");
expect(item.score).toBeGreaterThan(0);
}
});
it("should survive one entity search failure without losing other boosts", async () => {
const m = memory as any;
await m._ensureInitialized();
let callIndex = 0;
const mockEntityStore = {
search: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
callIndex++;
if (callIndex === 1) {
return Promise.reject(new Error("provider timeout"));
}
return Promise.resolve([makeMatch("e-ok", 0.8, ["mem-9"])]);
}),
initialize: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
m._entityStore = mockEntityStore;
m.embedder = {
embed: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockEmbedding),
embedBatch: jest
.fn()
.mockImplementation((texts: string[]) =>
Promise.resolve(texts.map(() => mockEmbedding)),
),
};
m.vectorStore.search = jest
.fn()
.mockResolvedValue([
{ id: "mem-9", score: 0.85, payload: { data: "surviving memory" } },
]);
m.vectorStore.keywordSearch = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(null);
const warnSpy = jest.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
// "John Smith met Jane Doe" extracts two proper entities
const result = await m.search("John Smith met Jane Doe", {
filters: { user_id: "u1" },
});
expect(result.results.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(result.results[0].id).toBe("mem-9");
// Should log the failure like Python does
expect(warnSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"Entity boost search failed for one entity:",
expect.any(Error),
);
warnSpy.mockRestore();
});
it("should call entity searches concurrently, not sequentially", async () => {
const m = memory as any;
await m._ensureInitialized();
const concurrency = { current: 0, peak: 0 };
const mockEntityStore = {
search: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
concurrency.current++;
concurrency.peak = Math.max(concurrency.peak, concurrency.current);
return new Promise<VectorStoreResult[]>((resolve) => {
setTimeout(() => {
concurrency.current--;
resolve([makeMatch("e1", 0.7, ["mem-1"])]);
}, 100);
});
}),
initialize: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
m._entityStore = mockEntityStore;
m.embedder = {
embed: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockEmbedding),
embedBatch: jest
.fn()
.mockImplementation((texts: string[]) =>
Promise.resolve(texts.map(() => mockEmbedding)),
),
};
m.vectorStore.search = jest
.fn()
.mockResolvedValue([
{ id: "mem-1", score: 0.8, payload: { data: "test" } },
]);
m.vectorStore.keywordSearch = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(null);
const start = performance.now();
await m.search("entity1 and entity2 and entity3 and entity4", {
filters: { user_id: "u1" },
});
const elapsed = performance.now() - start;
// With 4 entities at 100ms each, sequential would be ~400ms+.
// Parallel should be well under that. Use generous bound for CI.
expect(elapsed).toBeLessThan(500);
// At least 2 searches should have overlapped
expect(concurrency.peak).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
});
});