docs: add issue templates for bug, feature, benchmark, documentation, and update contact links (#4500)

This commit is contained in:
Kartik
2026-03-23 15:37:23 +05:30
committed by GitHub
parent ecedbc11d9
commit c5e8216362
6 changed files with 294 additions and 95 deletions
+60 -21
View File
@@ -1,23 +1,62 @@
name: 🚀 Feature request
description: Submit a proposal/request for a new Embedchain feature
name: Feature Request
description: Suggest a new feature or improvement for mem0
labels: ["enhancement"]
body:
- type: textarea
id: feature-request
attributes:
label: 🚀 The feature
description: >
A clear and concise description of the feature proposal
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Motivation, pitch
description: >
Please outline the motivation for the proposal. Is your feature request related to a specific problem? e.g., *"I'm working on X and would like Y to be possible"*. If this is related to another GitHub issue, please link here too.
validations:
required: true
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: >
Thanks for contributing 🎉!
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
Thanks for suggesting a feature! Please search [existing issues](https://github.com/mem0ai/mem0/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3Aenhancement) first to avoid duplicates.
- type: dropdown
id: component
attributes:
label: Component
description: Which part of mem0 does this relate to?
options:
- Core / Python SDK
- TypeScript SDK
- Vector Store (Qdrant, PGVector, Redis, Chroma, etc.)
- Graph Memory (Neo4j, Memgraph, etc.)
- Ollama / Local Models
- OpenMemory (MCP Server)
- OpenClaw
- REST API
- Benchmarks / Evals
- Other
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: use-case
attributes:
label: Use case
description: |
What problem are you trying to solve? Describe the situation where you need this feature.
placeholder: "I'm building X and need Y because..."
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: proposed-solution
attributes:
label: Proposed solution
description: How do you think this should work? Include API examples or pseudocode if helpful.
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: alternatives
attributes:
label: Alternatives considered
description: Have you tried any workarounds? Are there other approaches you've considered?
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
id: context
attributes:
label: Additional context
description: Any other context, screenshots, or references.
validations:
required: false