feat(ci): gate pull requests on an accepted issue (#6894)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,3 +51,43 @@ body:
|
||||
- OS:
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: textarea
|
||||
id: verification
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: How You Verified This
|
||||
description: We only take on bugs someone has actually reproduced. Show your work.
|
||||
value: |
|
||||
### What I Ran
|
||||
|
||||
The exact command or script, and where it ran.
|
||||
|
||||
### What I Saw
|
||||
|
||||
The real output, log line, or traceback. Paste it, do not describe it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why This Is a Bug
|
||||
|
||||
What should have happened instead, and what says so: a docs link, a
|
||||
docstring, a test, or the code itself.
|
||||
|
||||
### What I Ruled Out
|
||||
|
||||
Anything you checked that turned out not to be the cause.
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: dropdown
|
||||
id: ai_assistance
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: AI Assistance
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
This asks how the bug was found and confirmed, not how the text was
|
||||
written. Drafting the write-up with AI is fine. We ask because it tells
|
||||
us how much to trust the reproduction, not because it counts against you.
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- No AI involved
|
||||
- AI helped me find it, and I reproduced it myself afterwards
|
||||
- AI found and wrote this, and I have not reproduced it myself
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
|
||||
blank_issues_enabled: true
|
||||
blank_issues_enabled: false
|
||||
contact_links:
|
||||
- name: Discord Community
|
||||
- name: Question or general help
|
||||
url: https://discord.gg/6PzXDgEjG5
|
||||
about: Ask questions and discuss with the community
|
||||
about: Ask on Discord. The issue tracker is for bugs and accepted work only.
|
||||
- name: Documentation
|
||||
url: https://docs.mem0.ai
|
||||
about: Read the official mem0 documentation
|
||||
- name: Report a security vulnerability
|
||||
url: https://github.com/mem0ai/mem0/security/advisories/new
|
||||
about: Report privately through a security advisory. Never open a public issue.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,3 +21,17 @@ body:
|
||||
How should the docs be improved?
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: dropdown
|
||||
id: ai_assistance
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: AI Assistance
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
This asks how the problem was found, not how the text was written.
|
||||
Drafting the write-up with AI is fine.
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- No AI involved, I hit this reading the docs
|
||||
- AI-assisted, but I checked the page myself
|
||||
- AI found this, and I have not opened the page
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,3 +36,18 @@ body:
|
||||
Any workarounds you've tried or other approaches considered.
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- type: dropdown
|
||||
id: ai_assistance
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
label: AI Assistance
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
This asks where the idea came from, not how the text was written.
|
||||
Drafting the write-up with AI is fine. A request you hit yourself while
|
||||
building something carries more weight than one a model suggested.
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- No AI involved, this is a need I hit myself
|
||||
- AI-assisted, but the need is mine
|
||||
- AI suggested this feature
|
||||
validations:
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user